<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Goog411</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jasonmlee.net/archives/15/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jasonmlee.net/archives/15</link>
	<description>bytes about bits in church IT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 06:14:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Szpunar</title>
		<link>http://jasonmlee.net/archives/15/comment-page-1#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>David Szpunar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 01:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonmlee.net/archives/9#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Their privacy policy doesn&#039;t bother me. Interesting you should mention their 411 service though. I&#039;ve been using their SMS text message service (send query to GOOGL, or 46645) and so I almost never need to call via phone for 411. But &lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20071030-get-lost-a-google-411-and-microsoft-live-search-411-throwdown.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ars Technica just did a review&lt;/a&gt; I read a couple of days ago between Google&#039;s phone 411 and Microsoft&#039;s Live 411 competitive service, which is what I thought of when I saw your post. They did a lot more testing than I ever would!

Fortunately (for us), Google and Microsoft can both afford to throw money at tiny solutions that are useful in the hopes that it&#039;ll either be really big and they can sell more ads, or we&#039;ll just love them so much more for all they do for us (so it&#039;s branding, basically).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their privacy policy doesn&#8217;t bother me. Interesting you should mention their 411 service though. I&#8217;ve been using their SMS text message service (send query to GOOGL, or 46645) and so I almost never need to call via phone for 411. But <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20071030-get-lost-a-google-411-and-microsoft-live-search-411-throwdown.html" rel="nofollow">Ars Technica just did a review</a> I read a couple of days ago between Google&#8217;s phone 411 and Microsoft&#8217;s Live 411 competitive service, which is what I thought of when I saw your post. They did a lot more testing than I ever would!</p>
<p>Fortunately (for us), Google and Microsoft can both afford to throw money at tiny solutions that are useful in the hopes that it&#8217;ll either be really big and they can sell more ads, or we&#8217;ll just love them so much more for all they do for us (so it&#8217;s branding, basically).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

