<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More R&amp;D with ACS; 24k Contacts in OUTLOOK?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jasonmlee.net/archives/248/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jasonmlee.net/archives/248</link>
	<description>bytes about bits in church IT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 04:45:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Cheatham</title>
		<link>http://jasonmlee.net/archives/248/comment-page-1#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>John Cheatham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 18:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonmlee.net/?p=248#comment-373</guid>
		<description>I second Shawn&#039;s comment about Google Apps. Since they now use a form of ActiveSync (google.com/sync), it would be awesome to see ACS sync with Google Apps&#039; global contacts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second Shawn&#8217;s comment about Google Apps. Since they now use a form of ActiveSync (google.com/sync), it would be awesome to see ACS sync with Google Apps&#8217; global contacts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jasonlee</title>
		<link>http://jasonmlee.net/archives/248/comment-page-1#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>jasonlee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 01:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonmlee.net/?p=248#comment-284</guid>
		<description>Larry, in our tests we didn&#039;t connect any mobile devices to the server, but I would have no reason to believe that it wouldn&#039;t work with mobile devices since each is now just a contact in AD... all other contacts are visable in our production side from the mobile devices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry, in our tests we didn&#8217;t connect any mobile devices to the server, but I would have no reason to believe that it wouldn&#8217;t work with mobile devices since each is now just a contact in AD&#8230; all other contacts are visable in our production side from the mobile devices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Schultz</title>
		<link>http://jasonmlee.net/archives/248/comment-page-1#comment-282</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Schultz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 21:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonmlee.net/?p=248#comment-282</guid>
		<description>We are definately interested in integrating our contacts with AD.  Do you have any blackberries or iPhones that can read that data from a contact list in the AD?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are definately interested in integrating our contacts with AD.  Do you have any blackberries or iPhones that can read that data from a contact list in the AD?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jasonlee</title>
		<link>http://jasonmlee.net/archives/248/comment-page-1#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>jasonlee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 19:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonmlee.net/?p=248#comment-280</guid>
		<description>Jeff, welcome to the Family!  Its great news to know that Henderson Hills is joining the ranks of ACS... i think  you will be a great partner in &quot;pushing&quot; ACS too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, welcome to the Family!  Its great news to know that Henderson Hills is joining the ranks of ACS&#8230; i think  you will be a great partner in &#8220;pushing&#8221; ACS too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jasonlee</title>
		<link>http://jasonmlee.net/archives/248/comment-page-1#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator>jasonlee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 19:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonmlee.net/?p=248#comment-279</guid>
		<description>Josh, thats a great point... i never thought about then being able to extend the contacts via the GAL on mobile devices...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh, thats a great point&#8230; i never thought about then being able to extend the contacts via the GAL on mobile devices&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Espinosa</title>
		<link>http://jasonmlee.net/archives/248/comment-page-1#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Espinosa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 19:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonmlee.net/?p=248#comment-278</guid>
		<description>Certainly would. Would we then be able to have our BES hit it and keep all records sync&#039;d? Currently I have to manage both ACS and Exchange.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly would. Would we then be able to have our BES hit it and keep all records sync&#8217;d? Currently I have to manage both ACS and Exchange.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Wilson</title>
		<link>http://jasonmlee.net/archives/248/comment-page-1#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 19:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonmlee.net/?p=248#comment-277</guid>
		<description>I would most definitely like to see this happen. I serve at Henderson Hills in Edmond, OK. We are getting ready to implement ACS in the next weeks.

Thanks for working on this project.

Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would most definitely like to see this happen. I serve at Henderson Hills in Edmond, OK. We are getting ready to implement ACS in the next weeks.</p>
<p>Thanks for working on this project.</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Ross</title>
		<link>http://jasonmlee.net/archives/248/comment-page-1#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonmlee.net/?p=248#comment-274</guid>
		<description>I would LOVE to use this tool, but we do not use Exchange. It would be great to not have it tied to Exchange though. We&#039;re a Google Apps customer, and in my mind there&#039;s no reason ACS couldn&#039;t make this work with an open standard, and not just exchange. So, YES, I would use the tool, and I would be willing to pay for it (we&#039;re already an ACS customer, so we&#039;d have to see what pricing would be like). I just need it to have a broader target than Exchange.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would LOVE to use this tool, but we do not use Exchange. It would be great to not have it tied to Exchange though. We&#8217;re a Google Apps customer, and in my mind there&#8217;s no reason ACS couldn&#8217;t make this work with an open standard, and not just exchange. So, YES, I would use the tool, and I would be willing to pay for it (we&#8217;re already an ACS customer, so we&#8217;d have to see what pricing would be like). I just need it to have a broader target than Exchange.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Irvine</title>
		<link>http://jasonmlee.net/archives/248/comment-page-1#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Irvine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonmlee.net/?p=248#comment-273</guid>
		<description>No doubt... I would love it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt&#8230; I would love it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Michael</title>
		<link>http://jasonmlee.net/archives/248/comment-page-1#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonmlee.net/?p=248#comment-272</guid>
		<description>Yes, we would definitely use this if it were available. But it would have to be priced very reasonably and flat (not per-user or somesuch.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, we would definitely use this if it were available. But it would have to be priced very reasonably and flat (not per-user or somesuch.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
